Arguments for a model-dependent inference?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Inference from Controversial Arguments
We present new careful semantics within Dung’s theory of argumentation. Under such careful semantics, two arguments cannot belong to the same extension whenever one of them indirectly attacks a third argument while the other one indirectly defends the third. We argue that our semantics lead to a better handling of controversial arguments than Dung’s ones in some settings. We compare the careful...
متن کاملinvestigating the feasibility of a proposed model for geometric design of deployable arch structures
deployable scissor type structures are composed of the so-called scissor-like elements (sles), which are connected to each other at an intermediate point through a pivotal connection and allow them to be folded into a compact bundle for storage or transport. several sles are connected to each other in order to form units with regular polygonal plan views. the sides and radii of the polygons are...
A Computational Model for Arguments Understanding
This paper presents a computational model for the understanding of arguments in natural language dialogues. Previous work on argumentation in Artificial Intelligence has been mainly focused on the conceptual aspects. But argumentation is also a linguistic phenomenon. Language provides structures to express arguments, to orient the argumentative interpretation of utterances, or to present a new ...
متن کاملDeveloping a Risk Management Model for Banking Software Development Projects Based on Fuzzy Inference System
Risk management is one of the most influential parts of project management that has a major impact on the success or failure of projects. Due to the increasing use of information technology (IT) systems in all fields and the high failure rate of IT projects in software development and production, it is essential to effectively manage these projects is essential. Therefore, this study is aimed t...
متن کاملDefeat among arguments: a system of defeasible inference
This paper presents a system of non-monotonic reasoning with defeasible rules. The advantage of such a system is that many multiple extension problems can be solved without additional explicit knowledge; ordering competing extensions can be done in a natural and defensible way, via syntactic considerations. The objectives closely resemble Poole's objectives. But the logic is different from Pool...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Forestry
سال: 2015
ISSN: 0015-752X,1464-3626
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpv002